Part IV in a series
by Nicholas J. Vocca
At
the May 2 House Committee on Veterans Affairs, Chairman Jeff Miller,
(R-Florida), and American Legion National Commander James Koutz issued
somewhat scathing statements in regards to Department of Veterans
Affairs VISN4 Director Michael Moreland's recent award of a $62,895
bonus in the wake of patient deaths at the Pittsburgh VA Hospital he
oversees.
Saying
there is "no limit to the VA's tone deafness," and how "VA is dragging
its feet" in providing crucial information that would help victims of
the deadly Pittsburgh VA Legionnaires disease outbreak and Congress to
understand exactly what happened, Mister Miller called upon Secretary of
Veterans Affairs Eric Shinseki to "do the right thing" by taking
immediate steps to "recoup" Moreland's bonus.
"On
its own, this incident is egregious enough,"
Miller stated, then furthered how it was "unfortunate to learn how
multiple VA medical center officials have also received bonuses in the
wake of patient deaths linked to medical mismanagement.
"That's
why we are calling on the VA to conduct a top-to-bottom review of its
performance appraisal system to ensure outrageous bonus payments like
this do not occur in the future. In the meantime, VA owes us
all---especially the families of those who died---an explanation as to
why the (VA) awarded these bonuses."
Mister
Koutz stated that the American Legion is concerned that the VA is not
taking their own Inspector General reports seriously, and added that
"it's astonishing how the VA IG report would find a specific facility
failed to follow long-existing guidelines which resulted in the deaths
of five veterans, and yet within a week's time the Director of that
region should be singled out for the government's highest employee
honor."
"Even
the government's own guidance is clear," Koutz said, then cited the
Office of personnel Management's policy which makes it clear that
nominees for this award must not be involved in any investigation or
situation which would cause embarrassment. "I certainly think this
qualifies as such a case.
While
many veterans applaud Representative Miller's further announcement that
he is seeking a five-year ban on such bonuses, they are equally
disgruntled over the fact that VA officials are receiving them at all.
The
general question of some veterans who posted on one internet news site
is why are these people receiving bonuses at all when they are being
paid a respectable salary with excellent benefits and retirement which
is often above that of their civilian peers?
Most
have expressed the belief that public service has now become more of a
self-service career, than not, and
expressed further mistrust and anger with this agency based on a recent
news article where the VA purposely withheld funds intended for
veterans medical care.
The
article, published by several major news sources on May 13, reports
that the VA delayed spending approximately $765-million it was
authorized to spend which affected veterans medical care in some cases
because this agency postponed the purchases of cardiac monitors,
radiology equipment, and pain-medication pumps last year, as well as not
replacing old surgical tools, oxygen-delivery systems, or deteriorating
operating-room stretchers.
Although
at the time the VA had been under scrutiny from veterans organizations,
national leaders and much of the media for excessive disability claims
backlogs and bottlenecks in mental-health care, the agency transferred
money into a holding account which was the largest amount deferred in at
least 10-years, and more than eight times the amount shifted to the
fund two years earlier.
According
to agency spokesman Josh Taylor, the VA delayed these orders in hopes
of ensuring efficient spending and making awards to small businesses.
But, the House Committee on Veterans Affairs, who is probing this
agency's use of the account is not buying Taylor's explanation, and
neither are many veterans.
Cardiac
monitors. Radiology equipment. Pain medication pumps. Items which can
detect problems in the early stages, alert staff or a patient that ones
is occurring, and improve the quality of life for one in deep
excruciating pain, and
the very agency our nation's veterans rely on has again failed them
through mismanagement. Deplorable.
In future articles we will report even more startling facts about this agency, some which border on being totally diabolical.
Veterans
who were possibly infected with HIV or hepatitis as a results of some
attending doctors or dentists who used the same pair of gloves
repeatedly when treating other veterans, or equipment not properly
cleaned and sterilized before tending to other patients. Practicing or
using experimental drugs or surgical techniques on patients, despite
their protests. Rude treatment by staff towards family members, and
even physical abuse to patients.
Our
nation is
reasonably safe tonight because of the sacrifices of the millions of
brave men and women veterans, but when reviewing reports on the ways
some veterans Affairs Hospitals treat these veterans and their families,
one must also ask, "How safe are our veterans?"
No comments:
Post a Comment